Tennys Sandgren vs Bradley Klahn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L L L L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Sandgren 2 - 7 Klahn
They have played 24 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 9 and Klahn winning 15. The last match between Sandgren and Klahn was at the Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai, 06-10-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Bradley Klahn getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tennys Sandgren | 2 |
| Bradley Klahn | 7 |
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai(06-10-2018)
4
6
6
3
6
4
| Sandgren | Stats | Klahn |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 7 |
| 740 | Ranking | 870 |
| 41 | Highest Rank | 63 |
| 33 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 16 | Titles | 9 |
| 56% (421-325) | Career Total W/L | 55% (243-195) |
| $2,256,263 | Career Prize Money | $681,805 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 6 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Bradley Klahn
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
10
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(1) |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
82%
(
23 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(9) |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Bradley Klahn
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
20 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
Tennys Sandgren
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-1 7-6(7) |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Bradley Klahn
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
Tennys Sandgren
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
110)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 7 |
| 9 | Sets Won | 15 |
| 113 | Games Won | 131 |
| 42 | Aces (Total) | 40 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 26 |
| 1:34:12 | Average Match Time | 1:34:12 |
| 67% (443/664) | 1st Serve % | 64% (427/663) |
| 69% (305/443) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (322/427) |
| 55% (122/221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (133/236) |
| 31% (11/36) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (17/46) |
| 31% (208/663) | Return Points Win % | 36% (237/664) |
| 22% (2/9) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 78% (7/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (3/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 17% (1/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 80% (5/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 80% (5/4) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Bradley Klahn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Bradley Klahn
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Bradley Klahn
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
29 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bradley Klahn
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Bradley Klahn
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Bradley Klahn
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
9
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Bradley Klahn
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
17 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Bradley Klahn
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Bradley Klahn
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Harrison
Player
Bradley Klahn
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (421/325) | Win/Loss | 55% (243/195) |
| 56% (993/786) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (568/489) |
| 52% (8948/8222) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5375/5130) |
| 58% (241/175) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (189/119) |
| 53% (93/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (22/35) |
| 57% (76/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (26/23) |
| 52% (11/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (6/18) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 4008 | Aces Total | 2451 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1355 | Total Double Faults | 1359 |
| 1:18:11 | Average Match Time | 1:26:23 |
| 514.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 565.02 |
| 61% (25668/42295) | 1st Serve % | 63% (18641/29513) |
| 73% (18700/25668) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (13580/18641) |
| 50% (8246/16625) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5673/10872) |
| 38% (1428/3756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (903/2318) |
| 37% (15591/42108) | Return Points Win % | 36% (10561/29448) |
| 44% (25/32) | Slam W/L | 37% (18/31) |
| 36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 45% (14/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (38/55) | Main Tour W/L | 39% (28/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (195/154) | Challenger W/L | 63% (158/92) |
| 71% (151/62) | Futures W/L | 68% (25/12) |
| 57% (402/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (234/415) |
| 46% (17/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 52% (161/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (123/217) |
| 47% (110/236) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/148) |
| 83% (434/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (234/195) |
| 17% (434/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (234/39) |
| 20% (312/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (204/48) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
